Posted on

Ancient Web: Windows Refund Day Tried to Return the OS Nobody Asked For

On February 15, 1999, people showed up at Microsoft offices trying to return Windows.

Visit the Windows Refund Day archive

The basic complaint was simple: many PC buyers wanted the hardware but not the operating system bundled with it. Microsoft’s license agreement said users could reject the agreement and seek a refund, while manufacturers routinely made the practical act of getting that refund difficult or impossible.

So open-source users turned the problem into an event.

Marc Merlin’s surviving Windows Refund Day page preserves the story from inside that moment. It describes February 15 as a worldwide day when users of Linux and other operating systems went to Microsoft offices to return licenses they said they had been forced to acquire with their computers.

The page still carries photos, contemporary explanation, and video material from television coverage.

The battle was partly about a sticker

The late-1990s PC market made operating-system bundling feel almost invisible.

Buy a mass-market machine and Windows was simply there. The price of the license disappeared into the price of the computer. For people installing Linux, BSD, or another operating system immediately, that meant paying for software they did not intend to use.

Refund Day tried to make the hidden transaction visible.

The organizers’ argument leaned heavily on the Windows End User License Agreement itself. If a buyer did not accept the license, the agreement appeared to contemplate returning the software. The problem was that the software was generally not a shrink-wrapped box sitting next to the machine. It was an OEM installation entangled with the hardware sale, manufacturer contracts, and a distribution system where nobody at the retail counter wanted to explain who owed whom twenty, fifty, or a hundred dollars.

The campaign therefore became both a consumer-rights protest and a snapshot of the Linux community at the end of the 1990s.

This was before Linux laptops were a normal product category, before major manufacturers routinely advertised machines without Windows, and before open-source software had become an ordinary part of corporate infrastructure.

The Refund Day page now reads like a small primary-source packet from that transition. It preserves the rhetoric, the frustration, the logistics, and the television-news footage instead of reducing the episode to one sentence in a history of Linux.

CacheRat’s 1,967 Ancient Web Domains research list turns up pages like this because the old Web often kept movements in the same place they organized them.

A protest flyer, a press archive, a photo album, and a manifesto could all be one directory on somebody’s server.

Read Marc Merlin’s Windows Refund Day page

Posted on

Ancient Web: Internet Explorer Is Evil Survived the Browser War

The browser wars have been compressed into clean timelines now. Nathan Lineback’s Internet Explorer Is Evil preserves something those timelines usually remove: how pissed off people actually were.

Visit Internet Explorer Is Evil

The site describes itself as a record of the humor and controversy around Microsoft’s introduction and promotion of Internet Explorer. It grew out of the era when IE was being tightly integrated with Windows, Netscape was collapsing, ActiveX was a security argument at every technical lunch table, and browser choice was tangled up with operating-system power.

The historical value is not neutrality. The historical value is precisely that this is not neutral.

The web had buttons for hatred

There is an entire page of anti-IE buttons and banners.

Internet Exploder. Burn IE. Nuke Internet Explorer. Microsoft Internet Assimilator. A spinning pentagram. A Borg cube. A tombstone. A fake blue-screen joke.

Another page preserves parody WAV files, old MIDI files and a Windows screen saver that fills the display with burning Internet Explorer logos.

This is what political cartoons looked like when the political entity was a web browser.

The “Reasons not to use Internet Explorer” page mixes real technical complaints with deliberately stupid ones. System DLL replacement, ActiveX and operating-system integration sit next to claims that IE scares children, bites people’s heads off and costs exactly one soul per installed copy.

That mixture tells you more about late-1990s webmaster culture than a polished history ever could.

It kept going after the war

Lineback did not simply freeze the site when Firefox arrived. Later rants followed Microsoft through newer versions of IE, Edge, compatibility modes and the eventual retirement of the Internet Explorer application.

The broader ToastyTech site also contains the GUI Gallery, Windows utilities, old DOOM material and other preserved bits of personal-computing history.

For a webmaster in 2026, this is useful context. Browser compatibility arguments did not begin with Chromium, and platform owners trying to make their preferred browser unavoidable is not a new anxiety.

This page came from CacheRat’s larger collection of surviving old-web material.

Explore the 1,967 Ancient Web Domains research list

Do not visit expecting detached scholarship. Visit because detached scholarship rarely includes a rotating demonic Internet Explorer logo.

Return to Internet Explorer Is Evil