Tag: legalhistory

Posted on by

Ancient Web: CanonLaw.info Built a Research Center Out of Static Web Pages

CanonLaw.info looks like what happens when somebody decides a website should behave less like a publication and more like a filing cabinet with several centuries inside it.

Visit CanonLaw.info

Edward N. Peters’ site is a research center for Catholic canon law. The front page alone points into the 1917 Code, the 1983 Code, Eastern canon law, the Corpus Iuris Canonici, ancient collections, legislative history, commentaries, Latin texts, topical studies, abbreviations, and research tools.

It is dense because the subject is dense.

The web as a legal apparatus

One of the useful things about the site is that it does not pretend canon law can be reduced to a handful of FAQ answers.

Peters presents it as a functioning legal system with historical layers.

The 1917 Pio-Benedictine Code replaced older collections and remained in force until the 1983 Code. The site links original Latin texts, current texts, commentaries, historical materials, and tools for tracking changes.

It also gives the Eastern Catholic code its own path and reaches further backward into collections such as the Decretals of Gregory IX and Gratian’s Concordia.

This kind of organization is where static HTML can be unexpectedly effective.

A researcher does not necessarily need a beautiful interface. They need stable labels, predictable paths, lots of cross-links, and enough explanation to understand which document belongs to which legal period.

The page is unapologetically scholarly and personal at the same time. Peters identifies himself directly, includes his own research interests and notes, links side projects, and states where material represents his views rather than official legal advice.

That mixture used to be common on expert-run websites.

The specialist was visible behind the index.

CacheRat’s 1,967 Ancient Web Domains research list includes expert-maintained reference sites because they often preserve relationships between documents that a search engine can find individually but does not explain as a system.

CanonLaw.info is built around those relationships.

The design is not the point.

Knowing which shelf the law belongs on is.

Return to CanonLaw.info

Posted on by

Ancient Web: McSpotlight Put an Entire Corporate Court Fight Online in 1996

McSpotlight is what happens when a mid-1990s activist network looks at a multinational corporation, a giant libel trial, and the new World Wide Web and decides to upload everything.

Visit McSpotlight’s McLibel archive

The site launched on February 16, 1996. Its own launch history says volunteers spent roughly three months scanning documents and coordinating internationally before the pages went live in London, Chicago, Helsinki, and Auckland.

According to McSpotlight’s FAQ, the first version already contained about 1,300 files. By the end of the trial, the site says it had grown to roughly 21,000 files.

That scale matters.

This was not a campaign homepage

The McLibel case involved McDonald’s, Helen Steel, and Dave Morris, two London activists who defended themselves against the company’s libel action.

McSpotlight turned the dispute into a public document archive: witness statements, scientific reports, court material, media coverage, campaign arguments, interviews, audio, video, and background information about the company and the issues being argued in court.

The site’s presentation is openly activist rather than neutral, and it should be read that way. But the archive is valuable precisely because it preserves the campaign’s evidence, language, tactics, and contemporary framing instead of reducing the case to a paragraph written decades later.

Its surviving McLibel page also records later legal outcomes. The original English case produced findings that went both ways: the defendants failed to prove some allegations and were found to have libelled McDonald’s, while the judge also made findings critical of company practices. Steel and Morris later took the British government to the European Court of Human Rights, which ruled that their rights to a fair trial and freedom of expression had been violated.

The more interesting web-history point is the mechanism.

In 1996, a political campaign could suddenly bypass newspaper space limits and put thousands of source documents in front of anyone with a modem.

CacheRat’s 1,967 Ancient Web Domains research list includes old advocacy sites because they preserve arguments in the form they were actually made, complete with the documents their authors wanted readers to inspect.

McSpotlight did not just publish a position.

It built a searchable pile of ammunition.

Return to McSpotlight’s McLibel archive