Bill Beaty’s Science Hobbyist site has been on the Web since September 1994 and still feels like somebody’s workbench expanded until it became a directory tree.
Visit the We Nerds page at Science Hobbyist
The larger AMASCI site is a sprawling personal collection of electronics, physics demonstrations, high-voltage projects, science misconceptions, traffic-wave experiments, unusual phenomena, essays, and links gathered by Beaty over decades.
The we-nerds.html page is one small branch of it: a hand-built resource index aimed at nerds, outsiders, and people who did not feel especially well served by ordinary social categories.
That page is a useful reminder of what personal websites used to do before every need became a platform category.
Somebody found resources they thought might help a particular kind of person, wrote short descriptions, and linked them together.
No recommendation engine was required.
The same person can build a high-voltage page and a support index
Science Hobbyist is interesting because it refuses modern topical discipline.
Beaty writes about electrical phenomena, science education, circuits, strange observations, skepticism, amateur experiments, and material he considers unconventional or controversial. Elsewhere he collects resources about social isolation and being an outsider. The site follows the interests of the person maintaining it instead of the content strategy of a publication.
That does not mean every claim or every external link should be accepted uncritically. In fact, one of Beaty’s own essays on unconventional research argues for beginning with the assumption that you may be mistaken and trying to destroy your own favorite explanation before somebody else does.
That is a useful rule for any site wandering near fringe science.
The physical construction of the website also tells its age. It is a network of pages accumulated over time rather than a single modern content feed. Some areas are instructional. Some are essays. Some are link collections. Some feel like notes that grew too large to remain notes.
The result is messy in the productive sense.
A researcher can follow the author’s thinking across subjects instead of receiving a cleanly separated stack of articles with identical templates.
CacheRat’s 1,967 Ancient Web Domains research list includes personal sites like this because a long-lived domain often preserves more than its nominal subject. It preserves the way one person organized knowledge before publishing systems decided what a website was supposed to look like.
Thirty-two years of links will do that.