Posted on

Affiliate programs that outsource unsolicited promotion

Affiliate marketing creates a simple incentive:

Bring me a customer and I will pay you.

That can fund perfectly ordinary promotion—reviews, newsletters, comparison sites, videos, and referrals from audiences that actually asked to hear from the promoter.

It can also create a distance problem.

The brand gets the sale. The affiliate chooses how aggressively to chase it.

If the affiliate uses unsolicited or deceptive email, the recipient may see a message from some disposable sender while the company benefiting from the conversion sits several steps away.

That distance does not necessarily erase responsibility.

The Federal Trade Commission has brought cases where companies allegedly paid affiliates who sent unlawful spam to drive traffic. In a 2005 enforcement action involving adult websites, the FTC said the defendants could be liable for illegal messages sent by affiliates because they paid others to send email on their behalf. See FTC Cracks Down on Illegal X-rated Spam.

The FTC’s current CAN-SPAM compliance guide also warns that a seller who pays or gives someone a benefit for generating traffic or referrals may have compliance obligations depending on the facts. See the FTC CAN-SPAM compliance guide.

Outsourcing can also outsource temptation

A salaried marketing employee has a manager, a company account, and a reputation tied directly to the employer.

An affiliate may only get paid when somebody converts.

That can reward volume and experimentation. Honest affiliates still follow rules and protect their audiences. Bad ones may use misleading sender names, scraped addresses, deceptive subject lines, or other tactics if the commission exceeds the expected cost of getting caught.

The merchant can then be tempted to treat the problem as somebody else’s behavior.

But the economic chain still ends at the promoted product.

Accountability follows the money and control

A serious investigation asks who designed the campaign, who supplied the creative material, who paid commissions, who tracked referrals, what rules affiliates were given, whether complaints were monitored, and whether known abusers were removed.

Not every affiliate violation proves the merchant ordered it.

Not every merchant can plausibly claim ignorance forever either.

That is what makes affiliate spam industrial rather than merely annoying.

The person pressing Send can be replaceable.

The incentive system behind them may be the durable part.